United States ex rel. Campbell v. Lockheed Martin Corporation:
Brought on behalf of Albert D. Campbell, the former Cost Control Chief for Lockheed Martin on the company's LANTIRN or "smart bomb" program, under the qui tam provisions of the federal False Claims Act. The lawsuit charged Lockheed Martin with defrauding the United States government in nine military contracts valued at $4.5 billion, including violations of the Truth in Negotiation Act and the Foreign Military Sales program of the U.S. Department of Defense. Filed in May 1995 in federal district court in the Middle District of Florida, the firm litigated the case without government support for over a year before the United States joined part of the case in October 2001. The case settled in August 2003 for $38 million plus more than $2 million in attorneys fees and costs.
(status: settled)
Wilson v. KBR:
In 2004, the firm filed a qui tam law suit under seal against Kellogg Brown and Root, a former subsidiary of the Halliburton Corp., alleging that the company defrauded the United States by billing for but not providing required maintenance on trucks used for supply convoys in Iraq. The case was unsealed in November 2006. After a dismissal by the District Court, the firm filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The appeal is pending.
(status: ongoing)
United States ex rel. Kessler v. American Postal Workers Union:
Brought on behalf of Andrea Kessler under the qui tam provisions of the federal False Claims Act, the lawsuit charged the American Postal Workers Union with submitting false claims to the Office of Personnel Management in the operation of the Federal Employees Health benefits Program. Filed in September 1997, in federal district court in the District of Maryland, the United States effected a settlement of the case while it was still under seal. The case settled in January 2002 for $2 million.
(status: settled)
Seldowitz v. Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of State:
Brought on behalf of Stuart M. Seldowitz under the federal Privacy Act, the suit charged that the OIG of the U.S. Department of State used false documents in an effort to coerce Mr. Seldowitz into entering a civil settlement of allegations that he submitted false claims to the Department of State in his capacity as a Foreign Service Officer. Filed in April 1998, the case was tried without a jury in May 2002. Although the verdict was in favor of the OIG on technical legal grounds, the Court found that Mr. Seldowitz’s charges were substantially correct, and issued a written legal opinion exonerating Mr. Seldowitz of the wrongdoing initially alleged by the OIG.
(status: closed)